Search here...
TOP

#DressGate

I woke up to a barrage of photos of a reality television star (whom I will not name as publicity is how she makes money, we’ll call her KK or something else) wearing Marilyn’s Jean Louis gown. The gown which she wore at the birthday gala of President John F. Kennedy. Yeah, it’s a biggie. And people are slightly annoyed to say the least. As am I…

However, despite the fact I understand the historical significance of the dress and how delicate it is, a few things need to be considered:

  1. Is it as bad as the movies and documentaries that surround Marilyn’s life? No. No way. The subject in question has not damaged Marilyn’s legacy in the least. It has however made people judge her and her choices. She did it for publicity and she’s got it, positive or negative.
  2. Is it as bad as a certain pop star’s photoshoot depicting Marilyn’s death in the name of publicity? As above.
  3. Would Marilyn have cared? Marilyn was not a materialistic person. This dress was a one-off item that was sold off at auction and eventually made its way to Ripley’s Believe It Or Not for an extortionate amount of money. This was not a sentimental item to her like her piano. Do people cry that Mariah Carey probably sits and plays at it every evening? I doubt it.
  4. Do we have a right to be annoyed at this one person when Suzie Kennedy, a Marilyn impersonator, wore costumes (that were even older) in 2016? Okay, so the “JFK Dress” (I hate that term) is historic (maybe not for the right reasons as we will discuss in the next point) but aren’t her costumes from Some Like It Hot or Bus Stop? It begs the question… Are you more annoyed by WHO wore it as opposed to it being worn? Is it a question of the privileges money can buy? I personally feel any historical item of clothing, personalised/delicate/costume or not, should not be worn.
  5. Would the dress have any significance if there were no rumours of Marilyn and JFK having an affair? Thank you @silver_technicolor for that observation! If she wore this dress at the Golden Globes in 1962 I doubt there would be as much hoo-ha. But because people have in their mind that Marilyn and JFK may have done the deed that evening or even just because of the “affair”, it seems to give the dress more significance.
Suzie Kenny wearing Marilyn’s dress from Some Like It Hot

Nothing in Hollywood is untouchable. Don’t get me wrong I would have preferred no one to wear it. I’m shocked that Ripley’s let it happen but as the quote from La La Land goes…

Items like Marilyn’s dress aren’t sacred to the likes of celebrities who weren’t even bothered about making their own mark at the Met Gala. Billie Eilish was slammed for attempting to impersonate Marilyn at the 2021 Met Gala (despite Marilyn’s 1951 Oscar gown being an inspiration alongside Holiday Barbie). And yet the only effort made for this particular event by this person is starving herself (she lost 7kg in a month) so she would fit in it. What kind of message is that? That’s worse in my opinion than wearing a 60-year-old dress.

I Digress…

My point being I think there is more to worry about than being angry and wasting energy at KK who wore a dress for a short amount of time on the red carpet. I get the feeling that if it were Britney Spears fewer people would be upset… But not much less.

I get it. I really do.

I hate that Ripley’s think this is okay. I despise the message this gives – that money and a quick, dangerous weight loss plan somehow allow you certain privileges.

REMEMBER

No one can replace Marilyn. That’s a given. And no, the “celebrity” in question is not our generation’s Marilyn Monroe. Marilyn had to work for her fame.

And should someone want to honour her, they should wear a replica.

Was it worth it for 5 minutes on the red carpet? Well, the woman who wore the dress broke the internet once more. Therefore to KK, yes it was. It got her in the headlines once more and millions are talking about it.

Her publicity is what has given her fame and fortune. So, as opposed to feeding the beast and giving her the power of promoting the issue further thus increasing her ad revenue, I have decided to take comfort in that Marilyn probably wouldn’t have cared so much. I believe that it could be worse… Ripley’s could burn down and the dress be gone forever. Marilyn’s reputation remains intact after the dress was worn which is not what can be said for KK. What we need to put as much (if not more) energy into is how people VIEW MARILYN. Documentaries and movies, books and articles telling falsehoods and slandering are what we should be frustrated at. Not a dress or an event no one will remember in 10 years.

Anyway, does anyone know how I can get the Ruby Slippers for a friend’s wedding in August?

update: on 6th May 2022 the same celeb mentioned revealed she had also worn Marilyn’s 1962 Golden Globes dress. Needless to say, the community and I were, once again, p*****. I had previously discussed the dress in this post but I will be writing a separate post on it.

Our Marilyn Monroe

«

»

6 COMMENTS

  • Avril Wilkinson

    JFK as far as having any real significance where this gown is concerned is questionable.
    He means little to me. It’s a number of things I object to. Marilyn was a true natural beauty like the Dutchess of Cambridge. I believe Marilyn had had a little work on her nose. More than acceptable..
    Everything about the Kardashians is faux and plastic. They are grotesque in the extreme. That enormous arse had no business squeezing into perfect petit Marilyn’s dress… I wouldn’t approve anybody so tacky to even touch anything of Marilyn’s.. The only woman quality enough to don that gown would be another natural beauty like Catherine Middleton.. If Catherine had have worn that gown on the red carpet I’d have been gushing with love and approval…

    • Our Marilyn Monroe
      AUTHOR

      I personally think it should’ve remained at the museum, untouched and unworn. I don’t think it’s fair to slam other women or the choices they make for their bodies. I do think it’s okay to question her judgments.

  • T

    I think the difference between this and Suzy Kennie wearing the Some Like It Hot dress is that Suzy is an MM impersonator, celebrating Marilyn’s image. The same association cannot be made with Kim K. For Kim this is just about ego and publicity, not about Marilyn or Marilyn’s memory. What’s more sad beyond Kim’s audacity at wearing an iconic piece of Hollywood history, a fragile garment to boot, is that Ripley’s actually lent it out. It goes to show that neither party really values what the dress means and are only after the publicity it will bring them. Like most things related to MM, it’s exploitative. But this IS the Kardashian way…..exploit everything just to remain relevant. It’s not shocking, and it only serves to further affirm what a clueless egomaniac Kim Kardashian is.

    • Jilly

      There is a video of the white gloved handlers attempting to get the dress on K and , Shiver me timbers, I’m sure every curator was aghast. It did not look like they were giving it delicate treatment.

  • Jilly

    Wonderfully said. Love the LaLaLand quote. And, you’re absolutely right about protecting her history, legacy. There are articles out there that have an image of the impersonator (can’t think of her name, Chrissy? )and wrongly attribute it as MM. Further is the estate of MM who are creating CGI effects of Marilyn as “reimagined” . How she would look today, wearing designer clothing etc. Which will later be sold as NFTs.
    It really begins to dilute the actual person. People will think ‘this is Marilyn’ when it’s not. It’s really disturbing.
    Thank you so much for your post. It got me to calm down.

  • Jilly

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.